Content by April Yee
Esquire Theme by Matthew Buchanan
Social icons by Tim van Damme

29

Nov

Where American directness fails

NYT on the difficulties of Indian-Americans returning to India for work. The reporter interviews an Indian bureaucrat who sacked an Indian-American hire, saying the new guy had “misunderstood nearly everything”:

“To prove his point, Mr. Brahmachari, who was two hours late for an interview scheduled by his office, read from a government guide about decision-making in the organization. Mr. Ayyadurai didn’t follow protocol, he said. “As long as your language is positive for the organization I have no problem,” he added.

As the interview was closing, Mr. Brahmachari questioned why anyone would be interested in the situation, and then said he would complain to a reporter’s bosses in New York if she continued to pursue the story.”

16

Oct

Indianomics

Sure, life is cheaper in India. It’s what the country’s citizens choose to charge more for that surprises me:

  • Shampoo service at a salon (50 rupees) v. bottle of the salon’s shampoo (550 rupees)
  • Pineapple juice (15 rupees) v. apple juice (25 rupees) [And who drinks apple juice past age 8?]
  • Tax on saris (0%) v. tax on leather goods (12.5%)

With this data and carefully observed evidence, I can only conclude that this is how you are meant to live in India:

Enrobed in your sparkling, sequined, duty-free sari, sip upon pineapple nectar as a migrant from Northeast India massages suds into your three-foot-long mane, which naturally smells always of jasmine and coconut oil. After your dark-skinned, paan-chewing driver ferries you back to Defense Colony in your Toyota Qualis (with A/C), don’t forget to slap the maid. You, of course, are fair and lovely.